Skip to content

IACalc evaluates companies for investors.

What a company's numbers mean, cited to the page.

What IACalc does

Your intent, in your words

“A minority stake in a growth company. Target 3x in five years. The exit must be clear. Is the valuation fair?”

The company’s documents and accounts

Analysed with accounting and financial principles

How well it fits your intent

The problem

Investment analysis is expensive, slow and inconsistent.

RM30–100K

for an accounting firm’s report on one company’s books.

~2 weeks

for an analyst to work through one deal pack.

Subjective

depends on each analyst’s skill, methods and judgment.

Our solution

Investment analysis that is affordable, fast and consistent.

A fraction

of an accounting firm’s fee.

Hours

from documents to a report, every number cited.

Objective

consistent and predictable: same documents, same intent, same answer.

How it works

Machines read. Formulas calculate. Your intent decides.

1: Intent

Your goals and thresholds, set before any document is read.

2: Read

Text, tables, scans and filings. Several readers check each number; disagreements are shown, not hidden.

3: Calculate

Published methods: Altman Z, Piotroski, Beneish, DuPont.

4: Judge

Each check scored against your thresholds.

5: Report

Answer first. Every number cited to its page.

Where AI helps

The analysis is fully automated: no person edits the numbers or the verdict. AI is one reader among several and writes up only cited facts.

What AI never does

Make up a number or decide the verdict.

What you get

The answer first. Then the proof.

A verdict against your intent, the reasons behind it, and the exact page each number came from.

IACalc computes. It does not advise. The analyst keeps the recommendation; IACalc shows the numbers behind it.

IACalc reportSample company - illustrative
Verdict

Does not fit your intent at this price

Valuation is well above comparable companiesAnnual report, p. 112
The 3x target is met only if the plan is hit in fullBusiness plan, p. 9
No exit route is set out in the agreementShareholders’ agreement, cl. 14

Built for the people who have to defend the numbers.

Investment committees and the analysts who present to them.

  • Statutory and pension funds
  • GLICs
  • Insurers
  • Bank investment and credit teams
  • Shariah compliance teams
  • Due-diligence leads
Why this is hard

Three reasons no one has done it well, and how we did.

The difficulty

How we solved it

Documents are messy

Scans, tables and spreadsheets, in every format.

Several readers, cross-checked

Disagreements are shown, not hidden.

AI makes up numbers

Plausible but wrong, and a fund cannot defend that.

AI never makes the number

Every number comes from a formula, cited to its page.

The answer depends on the investor

A good buy for one fund is a bad one for another.

Our own framework

Turns your intent into the checks that matter. Patent pending.

Why us

Built by someone who has done the job, and already working for a client.

The experience

PhD in computer science and economics. Former Chief Architect at Yahoo. 30+ due diligences on over USD 2 billion of deals.

Our own IP

The framework and engine were built in-house in Malaysia. Patent pending.

Already proven

In production in Malaysia. A Malaysian statutory fund is a paying client.

Next step

See it on one of your own deals.

1 Send

A company’s documents, and your intent.

2 We run it

Your data is stored at rest in Malaysia.

3 Compare

We walk you through the report, beside your analyst’s view.

Dr Ariffin Yahaya · [email protected] · +603-2289 5000 · www.iacalc.com

See it on one of your own deals