Screen the document before you commit the resources.
Upload a PDIE, CIM, prospectus, or annual report. Describe your investment mandate. Get a screening verdict — calibrated to how you invest.
Real production output from the Alcatel-Lucent CIM
This is not a chatbot wrapped around a financial vocabulary.
IACalc is useful because it applies threshold logic, buyer context, and evidence sufficiency to the screening process. The output is meant to survive committee scrutiny.
Same document, same thresholds, same verdict path. Not model mood swings.
Yield, strategic IP, and distressed buyers should not receive the same conclusion from the same numbers.
The system tracks what is citable, what is sufficient, and what still needs investigation.
The question is not whether an answer sounds intelligent. It is whether your team can trace it, challenge it, and defend it as a reasonable basis for moving forward.
Three steps.Under seven minutes.
Upload a document, describe your mandate, receive a structured screening report your investment committee can actually audit.
Upload
PDIE, CIM, prospectus, annual report, or research note. PDF format. Encrypted in-browser before transmission.
Define your thesis
Stable yield, growth acquisition, distressed turnaround, regulatory arbitrage, or custom blend of 11 investment intents.
Get your report
Structured Investment Analysis Report with signal-level verdicts, transparent thresholds, source citations, and diligence questions.
Not a summary. Not a chatbot answer.
A structured Investment Analysis Report your investment committee can actually audit.
Intent-Aware Screening
Same document, different thesis, different verdicts. The same metric that breaches one buyer's threshold is irrelevant to another's.
Full Source Provenance
Every number traces to a source page and table. Every threshold is documented. The audit trail is not an add-on.
250+ Signals42+ Calculators
Altman Z-Score, Beneish M-Score, DuPont analysis, FCF conversion, leverage ratios, and forensic metrics across 9 risk domains.
Under 7 Minutes
Comprehensive screening across 9 risk domains. Your team focuses on the investment decision, not on data extraction.
Web-Enriched Context
Sector benchmarks, peer comparisons, entity profiles. The report doesn't exist in a vacuum.
No Fabrication
If data is not in the document, it is not in the report. No hallucinated ratios, no invented comparables, no assumed benchmarks.
Same company. Same data. Different buyer. Different verdict.
This isn’t a feature — it’s the whole point. The same financial metric is a critical threshold breach for one buyer and irrelevant to another.
Alcatel-Lucent · EUR 14.5B revenue · 4.8% EBITDA margin · Gross leverage 6.95×
Yield Acquisition
A dividend fund looking for stable, predictable cash flows to distribute to LPs.
Leverage exceeds the critical threshold for distribution capacity. EBITDA margin at 4.8% cannot support debt service and distributions simultaneously.
Strategic IP Acquisition
A tech company acquiring for Bell Labs patents and R&D capabilities.
Leverage reads below the critical threshold but above the investigation level. The IP may justify acquisition; leverage structure needs further evaluation.
Distressed Turnaround
A restructuring fund that buys struggling companies and fixes them.
All signals pass under distressed turnaround thresholds. The leverage that breaches yield thresholds is within expected range for restructuring plays.
Nokia acquired Alcatel-Lucent in 2016 for €15.6B — they wanted Bell Labs patents, not cash flow. Every verdict above is the correct answer for that buyer.
See it on a document you already know.
The most credible demonstration is your own document, screened in a form your team can interrogate, compare against internal work, and use as the basis for deeper review.